tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7875069982976812251.post4374357076314543629..comments2023-10-17T04:51:08.765-10:00Comments on KauaiEclectic: Musings: On Loyalty and FearJoan Conrowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00172330100788007499noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7875069982976812251.post-25365484870275262382010-06-30T05:16:40.152-10:002010-06-30T05:16:40.152-10:00I contribute and have follow Wikileaks for a few y...I contribute and have follow Wikileaks for a few years now and noted that 500,000 people saw the video 48 hours before the NYT or DN even saw it on the radar screen. Given the retribution against journalist like Joan this is the emerging new journalism "Unlike many other anonymizing networks, I2P doesn't try to provide anonymity by hiding the originator of some communication and not the recipient, or the other way around. I2P is designed to allow peers using I2P to communicate with each other anonymously — both sender and recipient are unidentifiable to each other as well as to third parties." Anyone who thinks taking out Julian Assange or extracting information from him using rubber-hose cryptanalysis doesn't understand I2P makes such info extraction impossible. Assange may be "the face" of Wikileaks but but the individuals who compose the network are protected by how the network is designed.Ed Collhttp://kauai.nernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7875069982976812251.post-10995033067004696082010-06-12T14:33:30.125-10:002010-06-12T14:33:30.125-10:00If people are getting sick from cleaning up the to...If people are getting sick from cleaning up the toxic mess, then it would be good to know and spread the word. But this would be bad for PR and stock values.<br /><br />The fish and shell fish if they survive will be polluted for many generations as well as the people who eat them, breathe the air and have skin exposure to the chemicalsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7875069982976812251.post-2341541589924180022010-06-12T12:03:33.888-10:002010-06-12T12:03:33.888-10:00It sometimes is a complex issue when our private r...It sometimes is a complex issue when our private rights conflict with our employer's aims and desires.<br /><br />I generally consider employment a voluntary arrangement, allowing the employer to make some otherwise invasive demands upon you. Drug testing? Dress code? Haircut? I acquiesce on these issues as conditions for my employment. If you don't agree, find another job.<br /><br />I have faced these same decisions in writing Darker View, I do often blog about working on the mountain. Generally these articles have been met favorably by management. But I have been asked to pull a post, and after discussion I did pull it. It was within my employer's purview to request this as the information and photos were obtained during the course of my employment.<br /><br />But is employment a voluntary when the company paying you has destroyed your usual opportunities to make a living? When they represent the only employment available?<br /><br />Is the employer doing something that is illegal, or at least morally reprehensible?<br />Things get a little murkier under these conditions, our right to free speech may trump the employer relationship.Andrew Cooperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16404795276468632488noreply@blogger.com