Friday, June 10, 2011

Musings: Charting a New Course

Koko, Paele and I spent about an hour walking through a totally trashed landscape the other day, and I’m not talking about abandoned cars or litter. No, this was acres and acres of former sugar cane land now solely inhabited by such invasive scourges as guinea grass, java plum, African tulip and a creepily super-sized form of wedelia.

It was lushly green, and that’s always nice, though it wasn’t by any stretch of the imagination pretty in its aggressive, smothering sameness. As I walked, I thought about the legacy left by the plantation era: greatly altered landscapes like this one, residual poisons in the soil, silted reefs, captured streams. And it struck me that our current economic mainstay of tourism is creating its own tragic legacy. Only when it ends, it will leave behind ravaged coastlines. How much more abuse can poor Kauai take?

It brought to mind a conversation I had this week with a friend, who was quite passionately expressing his belief that hydro is a good thing and FERC is the place to start. I listened, because I like him and know him to be well-informed. But when the discussion turned to trust, and he said the KIUC Board is dominated by local guys, born and raised, and they’re not going to sell out the island or do it any harm, I had to ask, starting when?

Because this island — hell, all of Hawaii nei — is rife with examples of local guys, born and raised, selling out the island and doing it harm. Yeah, the money and devious plans might have from elsewhere, but they were the ones with the stamp of approval.

So now we are looking at the concept of using one legacy of the plantation era — its ditches, reservoirs and stream diversions — to generate electricity for the resorts, deluxe houses and military installations that have taken its place. And yes, the rest of us who are on the grid, too. But really, it’s primarily for the big users, because as KIUC CEO David Bissell told us at the meeting last Saturday, their hearty consumption essentially subsidizes the rest of us, thus keeping our bills lower than they otherwise would be.

It struck me, as I listened to my friend and walked through the abandoned cane lands, that we’re going about this in an ass-backwards way. We’re looking at alternatives to get off us oil and supposedly become more sustainable, even as we’re encouraging an inherently unsustainable industry to gorge on mass quantities of electricity with its 24/7 AC and lights and fountains and laundry facilities. I was told the monthly electric bill for the Marriott alone is in the range of $300,000. Now that’s a lot of juice. Or more correctly, hard evidence of a giant disconnect.

So while we’re caught up in discussions of whether we should follow a federal process, FERC, to explore hydroelectric power — which is not to say we shouldn’t be talking about it, because that’s what’s now before us — we’re skipping the discussion that should come first: how much energy do we really need, and for what purposes? How can we encourage people to change their expectations, alter their wasteful habits, so that we want, and thus use, far less energy?

And how sustainable is any alternative energy source, really, if it comes at the price of our precious streams (big hydro), remaining ag lands (solar “farms”) and native birds (windmills)?

Because the cheapest approach, the one with the least impact, is always going to be conservation. I know we could do a lot more in that area, though I understand it isn’t in the best interest of KIUC to push it, because it’s got an over-capacity oil-burning plant at Port Allen and a business model that needs super energy suckers to sustain it so we little users don’t stage a revolt or suffer economic hardship over outrageous utility bills that more accurately reflect the true environmental and social costs of generating electricity by any currently known, large-scale means.

It seems to me that faced with the reality of carbon-induced global climate change, the vagaries and insecurities of an oil-based economy, the inefficiencies of delivering electricity over long distances, the uncertain future of tourism and the unresponsiveness of utility monopolies, even those that are member-owned cooperatives, we need to be looking more carefully at site-specific, user-owned, decentralized systems for generating electricity, be it stream-surface hydro, roof-mounted solar panels or what have you.

Because despite what we’ve been told for the last 50 years, small is beautiful, tourism isn't gonna be around forever and this ain’t the mainland, with its natural gas, coal and oil reserves, and frontier mentality.

Or we can dump a bunch of money into studies that, if "successful," will result in projects that continue to squeeze Kauai and have essentially the same effect as pretty much everything else we've ever done in the name of "progress" and economic development. In other words, we'll keep selling out the island and doing her harm because we lack the courage to admit we’re traveling a fool’s road to the land of folly, and the imagination to chart a new course instead of a reworked version of the same-old, same-old.

13 comments:

  1. I disagree.

    Small can be beautiful, tourism is gonna be around forever and although this ain’t the mainland, it is one of the states of the USA and will be taken care of. Things may cost more, but they will ALWAYS be available.

    Maybe the whole state will have a cost of living like Beverly Hills or something like that in the future, but it will still be viable to those who can afford it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, many locals have sold out. Even the Alii sold off Niihau. The Kamehameha clan sold off huge parcels of Kauai land (Happy Kamehameha Day to you too) e.g., Princess Ruth sold the land that is now the Marriott at Kalapaki so that she could build her own palace (now destroyed.)

    The FERC process is just wrong. It places the decision making authority in a far away place with no connection to this island. We need more sustainable farming to feed us and to replace those vacant pastures you've walked rather than have expensive mega-mansions that the locals can never afford. Who needs more hotels when they're only 60% occupied and where people mainly locals become second class servants?

    ReplyDelete
  3. "the unresponsiveness of utility monopolies, even those that are member-owned cooperatives.."

    Yep thatʻs it in a nutshell.
    Donʻt trust the local idiots on the board, they are too dum to comprehend...I still have flashbacks of a tearful board member testifying that he would put his signature on anything that would harm the aina...well, he did. But too stupid to know he helped give away the store.
    David Bissel isnʻt that bright either but he is a scammer and came here to fleece the dummies on an energy sell.
    He even stated, not too long ago, we have plenty of electricity well into the future.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry, typo:
    still have flashbacks of a tearful board member testifying that he would NOT put his signature on anything that would harm the aina...well, he did.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Are you prepared to live in a stone age level subsistence economy? Kauai has little to nothing to offer the rest of the globe other than tourism. Our people are uneducated; we have no mineral wealth; we've nothing really to sell. So it's either find a way to live with tourism without destroying the place or go back to 1850. Pick.

    It's true the big users overpay slightly. That's one of the few accurate things Bissel had to offer. But the rest is BS. FERC will be used to over ride local considerations and strong arm resistors. Why file on G&R streams if you plan to work with them? It's intimidation.

    Filing on the Wailua and Hanalei rivers is wankery of the highest order. Not gonna happen until everything else is done and people are desperate. Just a waste of time except for the consultants who will profit greatly. Bill Collett must be thanking his lucky star that KIUC came along to make him rich.

    ReplyDelete
  6. ..."the vagaries and insecurities of an oil-based economy, the inefficiencies of delivering electricity over long distances, the uncertain future of tourism and the unresponsiveness of utility monopolies, even those that are member-owned cooperatives, we need to be looking more carefully at site-specific, user-owned, decentralized systems for generating electricity, be it stream-surface hydro, roof-mounted solar panels or what have you" ....Well said

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey, Hey!!

    As a retired management consultant with 30 years in the profession, I have a coffee cup that proudly proclaims:

    "If you're not a part of the solution, there's good money to be made in prolonging the problem."

    My personal mottoes through the years have been:

    "No service too small, no invoice too large", and a paraphrase of John 8:32, "You will know the truth and the truth will set my fee."

    Those clients of mine made me a rich man.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Locals might well have a different vision than white libs and so would hardly be "selling out" by failing to act in ways white libs think they should.

    ReplyDelete
  9. When you said

    "Because this island — hell, all of Hawaii nei — is rife with examples of local guys, born and raised, selling out the island and doing it harm."

    I though you were going to write about Billy Fernandez

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Locals might well have a different vision than white libs and so would hardly be "selling out" by failing to act in ways white libs think they should."

    Like when Kusaka called off the grading inspector at Pfluegers?

    ReplyDelete
  11. more like alii trust worth billions while regular Hawaiians got squat.

    The rest are small timers compared to that.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Funny that you should mention the Marriott in your blog. During the rate increase hearings, which both the Marriott and PMRF contested, they stated that they were going to start generating their own and get off KIUC. Much later I met an MIT scientist who was coming to PMRF to work on big time solar and solar energy storage. So we, the little guys really are going to be screwed when the big users leave us to hold the bill for purchase of KE at exorbitant rate and the huge operating cost.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.