In the high desert, summer dawn is
typically a calm, cool, clear affair. Grateful for long pants,
sweatshirt zipped up against a low-50s chill, I walk and watch the
first rays form a halo behind a blue-black ring of mountains, hulking
on the horizon. Slowly, the light shafts lengthen, the sky brightens,
the slopes turn green-blue and the sun peeks over a softly-rounded
summit.
In a flash, it will rise and fully possess the day.
I was reading a New Yorker article the
other day about the bloody, costly mistake that was the American
intervention in Iraq. But I wasn't struck by Dexter Filkins'
account of the latest violence, or even his premise that it's deja vu
all over again, so much as his description of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki:
His long face conveyed, as it almost
always does, a look of utter joylessness. Having spent much of his
life hunted by assassins, Maliki gives the impression of a man who
learned long ago to ruthlessly suppress his feelings. “He never
smiles, he never says thank you, and I've never seen him say, 'I'm
sorry,'” a longtime associate of Maliki's told me.
And I thought, what could possibly
possess a person to seek out such a life? Who but a psychopath would
choose to live in such an emotionally stunted way?
Then I flashed on all the people like
Maliki — and his would-be assassins — strung out all over the
world, in positions of power great and small, deeply wounded
individuals possessed with a need to control, exert their will upon
others, indifferent to the misery they mete out.
How does the world change, can the
world change, with such an entrenched dynamic in place?
Being away from the Islands has allowed
me to view our populace and politicians — some of them similarly
possessed — in a slightly different context. For example, the huhu
over Kauai Councilman Tim Bynum's petulant pencil-pitching appeared
particularly petty when compared to, say, the Espanola, New Mexico,
city councillor who was arrested for allegedly pistol-whipping a man
and firing gunshots at his car.
And even the most rabid of the “lil
fistees” look pretty dang wimpy in comparison to the
pistol-packing populace allowed to roam the “roundhouse,” as New
Mexico's capitol building is known.
Still, I've been struck by some
stunning similarities. Like how the City of Santa Fe passed a
half-assed vacation rental law that it doesn't enforce, either, so
there's an estimated 700 units operating illegally.
Like how Councilman Gary Hooser, Kauai
Rising, and Babes Against Biotech are using the exact same rhetoric —
mobilizing democracy, opposing tyranny, grassroots opposition,
empowered constituents, the rights of citizens to protect themselves
— as the fanatical folks fighting any form of gun control in
New Mexico.
Or to paraphrase Shakespeare: that
which we call extremism by any other name would smell as stink.
I see that extremism rear its ugly head
daily in letters to the editor, and The Garden Island's comment
section. Most recently, there was outrage over Dow donating corn to
the food banks.
Not outrage over the fact that North
Shore residents, the wealthiest on the island and the most vocal in
their opposition to GMOs and pesticides, gave the absolute least in a
recent food drive.
And not a speck of outrage over how
many hungry people there are on Kauai — a whopping 20 percent of
the population. Yeah, that many. One in five. Most of them keiki and kupuna.
Nope. Just outrage over a company that
has been repeatedly pressed to grow food for local consumption
growing food for super-specific local consumption: its own employees,
with the excess going to the food banks.
Which brings me back to Tim and his
pencil. He threw it in a hissy fit because the Council
wouldn't quickly pass his anti-ag bill, which seeks to levy higher property
taxes on ag land used for seed crops and experimentation. Tim pressed for rapid passage — before the election — saying it's urgently needed to defend “real farms” and make chem companies pay their share.
Of course, we all know by now that Tim
himself got around paying his fair share of property taxes by signing
a farm dwelling agreement that falsely claimed he was engaging in ag
on his CPR lot. And he seriously undermined “real farming” by
pushing the bill that allowed vacation rentals on ag land.
So it's hard to buy the sudden urgency, much less Tim as an
effective poster boy of this particular cause.
Still, we'll have another chance on
Wednesday to see whether fair and equitable property taxes are indeed
a concern for Tim and the Council — when it's the mayor poised to squeeze
some political juice. The administration has introduced two bills,
which are on the Council's Wednesday agenda.
One, proposed draft bill 2548,
corrects a process that has resulted in the majority of timeshares
being assessed lower than condominiums.
The other, proposed draft bill 2549,
establishes a new property tax class of “residential investor”
that would apply to residential properties valued over $1 million
that do not have a homeowner exemption. County finance director Steve
Hunt articulates the rationale in a memo to the Council:
This
new tax class recognizes that high-valued residential properties tend
to be more speculative in nature, are not typically offered as
affordable housing, and often serve as second homes or investment
properties.
Seems reasonable to me.
Finally, imagine my surprise when I noticed, on that very same Council agenda, a request to spend $30,000 in special counsel fees to represent defeated prosecutor Shaylene Iseri, her former first deputy Jake Delaplane and the county in yet another lawsuit stemming from her reign of darkness at the OPA.
Finally, imagine my surprise when I noticed, on that very same Council agenda, a request to spend $30,000 in special counsel fees to represent defeated prosecutor Shaylene Iseri, her former first deputy Jake Delaplane and the county in yet another lawsuit stemming from her reign of darkness at the OPA.
And as so often happens, serendipity brought my post brought full circle.
What's the lawsuit about this time?
ReplyDeleteDiscrimination and retaliation.
ReplyDelete"The other, proposed draft bill 2549, establishes a new property tax class of “residential investor” that would apply to residential properties valued over $1 million that do not have a homeowner exemption."
ReplyDeleteBe careful what you wish for. That sounds like a tax on long term rental properties to me. Enjoy your rent increase.
Why come nobody talks about how Yukimura and Nakamura changed the language on the original bill?
ReplyDeleteEveryone was up in arms when Charlie got his 30K raise but no one talks about Nadine's 50K raise.
This Chem/Bio bill has more problems than its cover but one thing Kauai is great at is covering up things.
The lawsuits against the county of Kauai rises faster than Viagra to a dirty cops erectile dysfunction.
When you mentioned all the feverish little bastards and bastardettes that hunger for power and when they get it, usually become tyrannical it brought to mind how different and noble Hawaiiʻs own Queen Lilioʻukalani was.
ReplyDelete11:32 AM said "Enjoy your rent increase."
ReplyDeleteLast time I checked, there didn't seem to be too many landlords that were foregoing raising their rents because their property taxes remained low. Most landlords I know price their rents on what they can charge (supply vs. demand) and will pocket the profits when rents go up or absorb the difference when rents go down. I don't think they can raise their rents just because their real property taxes increased, as the same market forces that establish rent levels are in play. Higher property taxes to this market segment would simply mean lower margins of return on their investments.
I don't think many $1 mill properties are being rented out long term.
ReplyDeleteI do not know about this new lawsuit. Can you tell us who it is?
ReplyDeleteIs it possible that the former County employees might be wrong, and maybe instead of spending money defending the lawsuit, the County should negotiate a settlement?
Has that ever happened in recent years?
I've been reading your blog for many years now. Generally, enjoy it very much.
ReplyDeleteA pervasive theme of this blog is getting weary: wealthy people are evil or unkind.
Are there evil rich people? Of course!! However, I doubt the proportion of evil rich people is more than the proportion of evil poor people. Being evil or unkind has less to do with money than the overall nature of the individual themselves.
In fact, it could be argued that rich people are less evil since they have so much to lose.
Sitting around complaining about rich people is not going to make anyone more successful. Time to stop feeling sorry for yourselves, quit being envious and make your dreams a reality.
Why continue to extort money from property owners. Why should property owners be the main source of income for the County ? We paid our taxes when we earned the money to buy the property.
ReplyDelete"Tim's girly hissy fit"
ReplyDeletePlease check your metaphor, it is 2014 and attributing bad behavior to girls is sexist.
You can say it is not an insult to females, but your words attribute hissy fits to females.
Maliki has a master's degree in literature, and he's married with children. It's not hard to find photos of him smiling. There are evil people in the world, and Maliki may or may not be one of them. But it sounds like your assessment of his character is reading too much into a brusque personal style.
ReplyDeleteHey 4:47 PM. Way too much PC in your comment. I'm guessing most people did not had a problem with the girly adjective. The comment did not say that only girls or females have hissy fits but that Tim's was a "girly" style one. I saw it on TV and I get it.
ReplyDelete4:47 get over yourself, descriptive words are apt and in no way insult females. Hissy fit over Joan's choice of words is silly.
ReplyDeleteJeez, a psychopath? Based on what?? Maybe you need to step back a little and not take yourself so serious Joan. It's not all doom and gloom out in this big old world. And definitely, don't believe everything you read.
ReplyDeleteEveryone was up in arms when Charlie got his 30K raise but no one talks about Nadine's 50K raise.
ReplyDeleteNadine moved into a new job with much greater responsibilities and more time demands. Charley got a raise for blogging favorably about his boss. BIG difference.
Shay engaged in race discrimination, targeted her political enemy, used County resources for her outside job and her campaign, used the County car to go bar hopping, cost the County hundreds of thousands in payments to her victims and more than a million in legal fees but other than that, she was terrible.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteMoral of the story?
So send your kids to college to become lawyers......either make more useless laws, or represent the county and the police department when sued. Plenty business here on Kauai.
Lawyers always win (they get paid even for losing)
Zero Seven
Doctors get paid for losing too.
ReplyDelete12:16pm, you obviously don't read the County's budget. Nadine's raise was because she went from Councilmember at about $55k to a COUNTY MANAGING DIRECTOR about $100k+. These have always been the salaries for these positions. So stop your bitching and moaning. OH, and Charlie got his raise from SHAYLENE.
ReplyDeleteIf the EEOC determines there is a "right to sue" on behalf of the complainant, that means THERE IS A RIGHT TO SUE based on the evidence provided against the defendant. So it's not some conspiracy, the feds determined that there is evidence of wrongdoing by shaylene...these are our rights as employees, these are the laws to protect us, what if this happened to YOU. think about it...the lawsuit has every right to be made.
ReplyDeleteAnd obviously Nadine is worth every bit of her salary . The entire council fell apart after she left, making it a reality that her professionalism was above and beyond that of other council members. Smart move of Mayor B to notice her excellence and offer her the managing director job.
ReplyDeleteInteresting also how often Ken and Glen call for a county manager when we have one, a good one too.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDelete12:16pm, you obviously don't read the County's budget. Nadine's raise was because she went from Councilmember at about $55k to a COUNTY MANAGING DIRECTOR about $100k+. These have always been the salaries for these positions. So stop your bitching and moaning. OH, and Charlie got his raise from SHAYLENE.
July 8, 2014 at 9:48 PM
You people seem to forget about the Costa, Aiu, Heu, Janine, Lenny, Ernie, Rolf, Renae, numerous consultants fees, and the gas theft that has plagued this scandalous admin.
If someone offered you a position that gives you a 50K raise to change the language of a bill to make it susceptible to a lawsuit and to stall the implementation of the bill so the industries can get rid of evidence, would you do the deed?
It's like a judge asking an attorney to sabotage a client and in return the judge offers to give that law office more than their fair share of pro bono cases to supplement their income, would you do it?
Now ask these questions to the above name persons.
You all must have forgot. The Devils are in the details.
@4:48 if Nadine was doing the Mayor's bidding re 2491 she just would have stayed on the Council for one more meeting and voted no, sparing the Mayor from having to veto it.
ReplyDeleteThe problem with conspiracy theories is that when you start pulling on the threads the whole thing unravels.
ReplyDeleteIt's like a judge asking an attorney to sabotage a client and in return the judge offers to give that law office more than their fair share of pro bono cases to supplement their income, would you do it?
Wondered if the person who wrote this is being funny or an idiot? Wondered ?
Could it be that Nadine is a very smart lady and the mayor recognized her as the best possible candidate? Not everything is a conspiracy, some just good decisions.
The problem with conspiracy theories is that when you start pulling on the threads the whole thing unravels.
ReplyDeleteJuly 9, 2014 at 9:58 PM
Could it be that Nadine is a very smart lady and the mayor recognized her as the best possible candidate? Not everything is a conspiracy, some just good decisions.
July 10, 2014 at 6:42 AM
So what about the Kauai county furloughs? Was it a conspiracy or did the county have a surplus of 40-60 million?
What about the planning dept, was it conspiracy that illegal and unlawful TVR's were grand fathered in? If it was illegal in the first place than what makes it legal there after? Did they back pay the GE tax, insurance, and federal taxes?
I could give you more examples but you people are set in your ways. The good ol boys and gals believe that the world revolves around them.
The county furloughed because the rest of the state did and they would have a weaker argument for getting the TAT back from the state had they not.
ReplyDelete