Gov. David Ige has proven himself a wily
politician with his nomination of The Nature Conservancy's Suzanne
Case to lead the state Department of Land and Natural Resources.
Because the pick has effectively driven
a wedge between environmentalists and Native Hawaiians — the only
coalition that would be likely to challenge him on anything.
And local hunters and fishers are piling on, too, along with animal
rights advocates.
While the “greens” love Suzanne and
TNC's brand of upscale environmentalism, kanaka and hunters aren't
so keen on TNC's zero-tolerance of game animals, which it
exterminates as invasive species, sometimes through the use of snares
that PETA has proclaimed inhumane.
Sharp lines are being drawn — even as
Kauai Councilman Gary Hooser sent out an email effusing over Case's
nomination, which he credited to an “intense grass-roots effort
supported by a strong alliance of organizations representing diverse
yet common interests” that prompted Ige to ditch Carleton Ching and
appoint Case instead.
Civil Beat also bought into the hype
that Ige had experienced a “come to Jesus” moment and
miraculously seen the light, turning on a dime to replace a
developers' lobbyist with the head of a major conservation
organization. Its unquestioning editorial enthused:
“This Time, Ige Nails It. In his
second attempt at picking a new Department of Land and Natural
Resources chief, the governor taps an experienced conservation lawyer
with deep local roots.”
Even Sen. Laura Thielen, whose own
legacy at DLNR was the failed “recreational renaissance” that
called for the widespread privatization and commercialization of
state parks — including a hotel at Kokee and admission booths —
pronounced that Case passed muster. (Btw, how did Thielen ever become
the darling of greens? Have they completely forgotten her tenure at
DLNR?)
Meanwhile, Molokai activist Walter
Ritte and others who denounced Ching — and supported Hooser on
anti-GMO and anti-pesticide causes — are now blasting Case. They
don't like TNC's disdain for game animals, its support for marine
protected areas and its penchant for fencing off land and eradicating
all the non-native mammals within.
They've launched a Move-On petition
that proclaims “Protect our Hunting, Fishing, Diving &
Surviving!” and calls for Suzanne Case's removal. With some 550
signatures at last check, it states:
We the residents of Hawaii depend on
the animals that we're given to King Kamehameha so we the people
could be self sustainable. Allowing Nature Conservancy Director
Suzanne Case to head the Department of Land and Natural Resources
will be a total disaster to our race and our culture. With Suzanne
Case being the Chairperson of DLNR there will be no animals to
harvest because of fences and eradication. People of Hawaii, one day
the ships will stop coming and the only thing that we will have to
eat is the animals in the forest, fish that swim in the sea, and the
produce that that our farmers produce!!! Remove Nature Conservancy
Director Suzanne Case NOW before its to late!
In posting the petition link on his
Facebook page, Ritte wrote:
This lady is bad news for all
traditional and subsistence practitioners. Sign the petition.
In signing the petition, Terrance EK
Castillo of Kekaha wrote:
They already took away the KINGDOM,
most of our LANDS, our major WEST SIDE FISHING AREA, What's next? Get
that #$%^&@ Suzanne Case out of there. Take down the fences that
are already up. #%@$^&* @!$%^*&
Robert Duerr from Hilo expressed
similar sentiments:
The case against the TNC and Case?
Eradication, aerial killings, citizen kapu fences are not a game
management plan.
Gosh. Looks like the unraveling of Hooser's
“strong alliance of organizations representing diverse yet common
interests.”
Not to mention that one of Case's first
chores, should she be confirmed, is dealing with the frankly
unresolvable conflict over the Thirty Meter Telescope, which is on
conservation land that DLNR has leased to the University of Hawaii.
Talk about an extremely hot seat. Can
you spell lose-lose? Can you say hamstrung from the get-go?
And as Case gets savaged, and ultimately marginalized in the fray, Ige emerges smelling like a rose, having given some folks, at least, exactly what they wanted.
Oh the hypocrisy! "Ban GMOs because they hurt the aina! Protect invasive species that hurt the aina because WE benefit from them!"
ReplyDeleteIt's right there with, "pesticide drift is killin' us all! Burning smoke drift should be protected because we want BBQ!"
And Dylan Hooser's, "ban GMOs, but don't ban questionable sunrise shell harvesting because that effects ME!"
And just to be clear, I don't think the government should ban any of those things, even though I don't benefit from any of them.
The State has been assaulting traditional and subsistence practitioners for several years. As you recently reported, they are prosecuting a Kanaka for pig hunting in the forest to feed his family. Now they are appointing politicians who want to kill all the game animals altogether.
ReplyDeleteThe apology, the promise of reconciliation and the constitutional protection of subsistence rights for cultural practitioners are revealed as big lies.
All races should be allowed to hunt. That is how game was controlled when I was young. And I seem to remember Ed Case being a hunter and fisherman. Expand hunting.,
ReplyDeleteAh the price, of living on the reservation.
ReplyDeletenot to worry, goin get enough wild pigs for everyone even if they plan to erradicate cuz, they just can't keep up! and stop making trouble by gettin everybody worked up about the new person for dlnr---if not ching, case---than who? neva satisfied--------
ReplyDelete"and stop making trouble by gettin everybody worked up about the new person for dlnr"
ReplyDeleteare you talking to Walter Ritte?
This blog is so fun. Mr Lasker none of this affects you that's for sure. Cuz u don't fish you don't hunt you have no family here and are not connected to anyone in any way You sir are from the mainland, and are a very recent arrival.
ReplyDeleteYou are the very prerson that said that the GMO crowd were not from here. Now you are stating they are by implying it is 'their lifestyle", and that they are being hypocritical. Coming from the King of Hypocrites that is pretty rich,sir!
The people who are against the smoke ban are not the same people for the GMO ban and vice versa.
You should really get out more. Also stop being jealous of Walter. He has done more in his lifetime for the good of humanity then any of you could do in ten.
You new comers should really educate yourselves before you start criticizing pure Hawaiian born and raised people like Walter.
Seriously it just makes you look like a total jerk.
" It wouldn't, of course. But it's all part of the show that Gary and the anti-GMO folks are putting on, replete with the usual lies, as posted on the HAPA Facebook page: “Syngenta sprays literally tons of restricted use pesticides on the tiny island of Kaua`i - next to schools, hospitals, and homes.”
ReplyDeleteExcept it doesn't. The company has voluntarily implemented buffer zones."
LMAO. Yea, voluntary buffer zones. Joan you are a hack and always have been. How can it be legal to spew such lies and call it a blog when you clearly have an agenda. You don't even have your facts straight. If not for 2491, the companies would not have even tried to address these crappy little buffer zones they have set up, which are meaningless. Get out and get educated people.
You're the one who needs to get educated. Syngenta did a school buffer before 2491 was ever introduced. And all The companies have continued to provide buffer zones even though they aren't legally required since 2491 has been struck down. But regardless of their motivations, they do have buffer zones. So Gary is flat out lying when he claims they are spraying next to school, hospitals and homes, and he knows it. Who's got the agenda?
ReplyDelete