Friday, October 25, 2013

Musings: Worth Noting

It's hard to buy the argument that same-sex marriage, up for a vote in next week's special Legislative session, would weaken traditional marriage. How so? Allowing same-sex couples to wed doesn't take anything away from anyone. It merely expands to all the same rights now enjoyed by some.

It's even harder to buy the claim that allowing same-sex marriage will expose public school students to graphic depictions of homosexual sexual practices. Mmmm, they aren't being exposed to graphic depictions of heterosexual sexual practices, are they?

And it's really hard to see how state Sen. Ron Kouchi, elected to represent the entire island of Kauai, can justify his opposition to same-sex marriage by saying he's "invoking my constitutional rights to express my freedom of religion."

Yes, Ron has the right to express his religious freedom in terms of where he chooses to worship on his down time. But when he's in the Legislature, he needs to set his religious beliefs aside and consider the interests of all Kauai, not just the beliefs and doctrine of his church. Because last time I looked, the Lege was a secular body.

Legislators also will be considering a number of Gov. Abercrombie's proposed appointees, including developer Shawn Smith as the Kauai representative to a term on the Board of Land and Natural Resources that runs through 2016.

As I've previously reported, Shawn is part of Kahuaina Plantation, the uber upscale gentleman's estates at Waipake being passed off as an “agricultural subdivision.” And we're supposed to believe he'll be a conscientious caretaker of the state's natural resources?

Abercrombie is also asking the Lege to approve Genevieve Salmonson as director of the Office of Environmental Quality Control. Gary Hooser held the post prior to his election to the Kauai County Council. As The Hawaii Independent reports:

Salmonson previously held this position under the Lingle administration, during which time she controversially agreed that the Superferry project was exempt from having to provide the State with an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), leading to a long and bitter fight between the State and environmental groups that eventually ended in 2009 when the Supreme Court ruled that the law allowing the Superferry to operate without an EIS was unconstitutional.

In other news, for the first time ever a majority of Americans favor legalizing marijuana. A Gallup poll shows 58 percent support — up 10 points in just the last year and a whopping 46 points since 1969. Americans 65 and older are the only age group that still opposes legalizing marijuana, while 67% of Americans aged 18 to 29 back legalization.

We need to seriously consider legalization and decriminalization because let's face it: the war on drugs has utterly failed. Or as Esquire reports:

Not only are drugs way purer than ever, they're also way, way cheaper. Coke is on an 80 percent discount from 1990, heroin 81 percent, cannabis 86 percent. After a trillion dollars spent on the drug war, now is the greatest time in history to get high.

Both the legal and illegal alteration of consciousness is at an all-time high.

In 2010 the CDC found that 48 percent of Americans used prescription drugs, 31 percent were taking two or more, and 11 percent were taking five or more. Two of the most common prescription drugs were stimulants, for adolescents, and anti-depressants, for middle-aged Americans.

And finally, I urge anyone who loves the ocean and cares about the planet to read “the ocean is broken,” a haunting article in the Newcastle Herald. A friend described it as an “astonishingly captivating piece” recounting the shocking change in ocean conditions that Newcastle yachtsman Ivan Macfadyen encountered while recently sailing the same same course from Melbourne to Osaka that he'd taken 10 years earlier:

It was the silence that made this voyage different from all of those before it.

No fish. No birds. Hardly a sign of life at all.

Spooky, scary and sad.

22 comments:

  1. Here's the absurd analogy but it makes the point: If the majority of Hawaii or any other state wanted their representative to legalize slavery, bestiality, murder, etc. does the representative have an obligation to listen and vote in favor simply because his constinuency wants him to? At what point can his moral compass guide his decision where he stands against even the wishes of the majority? It's not as simple as saying same-sex marriage doesn't cause harm. It comes down to what your core beliefs are based on. If they're relative, I guess anything goes as long as the majority agrees. If they are founded in the Bible and are absolute despite the majority movement then one would have to stand firm in the face of severe criticism. I applaud Ron for standing firm in what he believes deep in his heart. That is courage and is to be commended. There is too much relativism in today's society. We're back to the late '60s / early '70s slogan, "If it feels good, do it". That is a dangerous place for our society to be. Think of Lincoln standing firm in the face of adversity as he fought to eradicate slavery. Think of the many that fought for a woman's right to vote.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let's get Ron's e-mail address and flood his mailbox about representing us not his religious beliefs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. does the representative have an obligation to listen and vote in favor simply because his constituency wants him to?

    i would say 'yes'......was'nt he put in place to represent the will of the people?

    or to be our moral guide thru life as he believes it should be? like, "i will lead my flock to where i think they should be, even if they dont want to be there" ?

    i have no opinion on gay marriage being law, but i do have an issue when those in power that make rules "for the good of the people" even if the majority may not agree, take it upon themselves to dictate their personal agenda on his flock. aloha Dean

    ReplyDelete
  4. senkouchi@Capitol.hawaii.gov

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just put on red shirts, barge in to the Capitol, and terrorize them until you get your way. It's the new way to achieve democracy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. As the Da Judge always says,

    Elect better people.

    ReplyDelete
  7. October 25, 2013 at 1:38 PM:
    I think it is great to see people get involved in politics……I do resent politicians voting a certain way due to intimidation.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If they don't allow same sex marriage, then heterosexual couples should be stripped of their marital status being recognized by the gov't for tax and medical purposes. That way everyone's treated equally.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Who cares about who marries WHOM? You should care about who marries YOU..

    ReplyDelete
  10. If freedom was not just a slogan people would be free to marry whomever they want and the rent their houses to whoever they want and to take whatever drugs they want and to hire prostitutes if they both want and to gamble if they want.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ron Kouchi is misunderstanding the willingness of the legislative leadership to allow individual legislators the "freedom" to vote their "conscience," their DISTRICT, or, for that matter, their prejudice. Just because they do have that "freedom," does not mean he should try to elevate that to some high-faulting "freedom of religion."

    All religions reflect competing values and those who seek justifications for base, dark emotions and policies, can usually find scripture to support their pre-disposition. But those seeking to expand equality, work for peace and universal brotherhood/sisterhood, can also find scripture in all religions in support of those aims.

    Kouchi chooses to attach himself to the regressive scriptures rather than the progressive. He has the freedom to be prejudiced. But it is a sad joke he confuses that with "religious freedom."

    ReplyDelete
  12. A few people getting married will do little to impact your life. The big Ag Condos have changed Kauai forever.
    Less access, fewer beaches, less land to be developed for the regular people and more elitist residents...If you want to feel like a fish out of water (or a criminal), go to Kalihiwai Ridge, Aliomanu, Papaa Bay, Kilauea Ag CPRs.....yep, that will be Kauai, if you are a local, bring your lawnmower and cut the grass or else stay away.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Marriage equality is one of EQUALITY!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why do people care who other people love?

    ReplyDelete
  15. "The ocean is broken" is sad and scary. But thank God it's only anecdotal and we need proof, right?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Everything in that article HAS been scientifically documented. Where you been?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Why try to cram same-sex marriage through in this manner? Let the people vote on it. Let the majority speak their consciences on a this and other highly controversial topics by voting themselves in the privacy of the voting booth. Derek, Dee, Jimmy, Ron? I'm sure you see the wisdom in that? The current method is wrong for such a controversial subject.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yeah sure...I'm sure they would have ended segregation if it were put to a vote right?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Because "the people" don't get to vote on each other's civil rights

    ReplyDelete
  20. The citizens are not informed enough to vote on this marriage issue. This is very important. It will benefit all of us if the State will give rights based on chosen behavior. In the past rights were given because of how you were born, not by activity.

    ReplyDelete
  21. So, if I say "let Ron/Jimmy/Derek/Dee vote their conscience" you attack the argument as saying they should vote the will of the people. If I say "let the people vote" (which is, by the way, the will of the people) you say "the citizens are not informed enough" or conclude that segregation wouldn't have ended if left to the people. You can't have it both ways. This is a highly controversial issue and the people who have to live with the consequences (pass or not) should be given the right to vote on this. Sounds like proponents want a guaranteed passage. Damn whatever anyone else thinks. Ron/Derek/Dee/Jimmy - don't let this process be hijacked by impatience. This has far-reaching consequences that must be considered. Consider the people who want their say in a private voting booth.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Just say NO to Shawn Smith! He's got all his ex Police buddy's Barriga double dipping for him & M Gordon the two ex internal affairs guys that shamed the PD. Just say No to S Smith!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.