Sunday, February 1, 2015

Musings: Hawaii Pawn in GMO Debate

I have a guest commentary in today's issue of the Honolulu Star-Advertiser, which they titled “Outsider funding of anti-GMO efforts in Hawaii not really about 'home rule.'”

Since it's behind a paywall, I'm posting it here:

As international anti-GMO activist Vandana Shiva led a rally at the Jan. 21 opening of the state Legislature, I reflected on how much had changed since I first encountered her on Kauai, two years ago.

Shiva had come to Kauai for one purpose: to exhort us to throw out the biotech seed companies that farmed the abandoned sugar fields. She was accompanied by Andrew Kimbrell of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Food Safety (CFS), and the two of them riveted a crowd that was large for our rural island.

I left energized, reassured in the correctness of my own long-standing aversion to pesticides, biotech agriculture and the multinational chemical companies that manufactured both. GMO-Free Kauai, a tiny fringe movement, was suddenly hip, infused with money and a mission. Change was in the air, and I assumed it would be good, since it was orchestrated by the “good guys” — progressives, activists, environmentalists.

But as the anti-GMO campaign unfolded, first on Kauai, then Hawaii Island and Maui, I was increasingly alarmed, and ultimately alienated. Any questioning of the issue or movement was immediately, and often viciously, shut down. Political demagogues were elevated to star status. Activists had no compunction about engaging in fear-mongering, propaganda and intentional misinformation campaigns — strategies they'd condemned when practiced by the chemical companies.

It became almost unbearable to watch my community polarize and divide as seed company employees, many of them former plantation workers, were accused of poisoning the land and their neighbors. Lies and fears were accepted as truth, and those who spoke against the activists were harassed.

No middle ground was ever staked, no compromise ever floated. It was only black or white, with us or against us, when it seemed to me that the issue was very gray, and most folks didn't want to take sides.

Disenchanted by the lock-step mentality of the movement, I began looking more closely at the organizations that supported it. How could they afford to bring in Shiva — who charges $40,000 and first class airfare from India — buy ads, pay unregistered lobbyists? I discovered the Hawaii movement is funded almost entirely by mainland groups — primarily Center for Food Safety — using money donated by heirs of oil, pharmaceutical and manufacturing fortunes, including Merck, Getty, Rockefeller and the Ceres Trust. It is not a local, grassroots, anti-corporate movement.

These mainland groups operate — and secure their own ongoing funding — by waging political and legal battles in small communities where they hope to secure victories that can be leveraged elsewhere. Shiva, who is closely aligned with CFS, serves as a charismatic cheerleader.

Hawaii has been played as a pawn in this strategy, which has international aspirations. A similar steamroller campaign was also used in Thailand, with similarly divisive effects on the community. Meanwhile, CFS, Pesticide Action Network, Food Democracy Now and other groups are using Hawaii's anti-GMO battle in fundraising appeals to benefit their own organizations, not local residents.

So what has Hawaii gotten from this two-year war against GMOs? Three poorly written bills, all of them being challenged in court; a lot of bad feelings; seriously divided communities; a resurgence of anti-haole sentiment, especially on the Neighbor Islands; activist lobbying that eludes transparency and accountability; and county legal bills that have not been fully paid. Yet we're no closer to assuaging any of the fears expressed by residents, or resolving community concerns.

So when I see Shiva, back for a third time now, issuing her latest battle cry of “Home Rule,” I can only shake my head in dismay. What we need now is not more outside agitation, but “Home Heal.”   


Anonymous said...

What an excellent summary of how Pogo's "We have met the enemy and he is us" developed on Kauai!
Pete Antonson

Anonymous said...

Joan, Thank you for your consistent and at times relentless, news reporting. Your constancy on Kauai's pulse is a lot of work. Your words are read by many and are a real significant part of Kauai politics. You, unfortunately have been either the darling of the antis or the bane of the same group. How ever the vicissitudes of the the Fistees diatribes may affect you personally, I feel you are doing a real service to the greater good. And I hope that if you are effected personally, know that many many Kauai folks hold you in high regard, respect and a certain anonymous and distant fondness. Lots of folks. A good spirit you be.
Funny, when you speak on TVRs, you are the Good Queen and when you speak of common sense regarding Agriculture you are the Mean Queen.
My anonymous few words here are intended to purely Thank You. You and I are usually at complete opposites on Kauai politics, but your insight, intellect, clear writing and love for Kauai makes this island a better place.
Kauai may have more talent in it's 60,000 residents than any place in the country. If we could follow your suggestions on having HONEST open dialogue, many good things could be the result.
Please keep writing. You are widely read. Your words have a real effect on our citizen's knowledge.
Thank you from the many silent Anonymous (Anonymouses, Anonymi, Anonymice.)

Anonymous said...

Ditto 12:10 pm.

Joan Conrow said...

Many thanks for your words of praise and encouragement!

Anonymous said...

It made my morning to see the column in this morning's Star-Advertiser. Another home run!

Anonymous said...

Yeah, and the main polarizer on Kaua'i is here on O'ahu for the second straight day at the state capitol. how come, no mo council work for do?

Anonymous said...

Presently, Hawai‘i is used as an outdoor laboratory for companies like Monsanto to test genetically engineered crops and their related pesticides. In 2014 alone there were 1,381 field test sites; California only hosted 178 sites. They are spending millions of dollars to not have to disclose what they are spraying and when they are doing it. How can this be good? I don't understand how anyone who truly cares about our aina and our keiki can be ok with poisons being sprayed all over and be ok with these mainland companies keeping secrets from those of us who are living with their chemicals. Most of these crops are engineered to resist herbicides and pesticides. Testing these crops means repeated spraying of dangerous chemicals near neighborhoods, schools, and waterways. These are test crops for their profit. These crops are not providing food for our islands. In the end nature bats last so my hope is that in time you will see the truth of the damage that is being done. I just hope it isn't too late.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous @ 11:39, you are merely repeating the lies that have been disproven time and time again. You might want to take a clue from recent election results (both local and elsewhere) that your closed-minded activism is losing traction. Might want to look into who is really behind the anti-GMO & anti-pesticide groups. Hint: it ain't grassroots organizers